The 710 Tunnel is History!

After years of controversy, 710 Freeway tunnel is dead. Millions will be spent on street improvements

DAst9_PXUAIR3SI.jpg

LA Times | by Dan Weikel | May 25, 2017 3:55pm 

"The fight over how to connect the stub ends of two freeways has spawned anger and litigation for decades, pitting neighbor against neighbor in the San Gabriel Valley and nearby areas.

On Thursday, the proposed 710 Freeway tunnel — most recently the leading option — effectively died.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority board voted unanimously to withdraw its support and funding for a five-mile, $3.2-billion tunnel through El Sereno, South Pasadena and Pasadena connecting the 710 and 210 freeways.

Instead, the board voted to spend $700 million on a range of transportation fixes to ease congestion and other problems arising from traffic spilling onto the streets of Alhambra at the 710’s abrupt northern terminus." READ MORE

Add your reaction Share

SR-710 Metro Board Vote: Thursday May 25, 2017

BeyondThe710.png
This is just a reminder that the Metro Board will be voting on the attached motion/board report regarding the SR-710 this Thursday, May 25th at 9:00AM. The meeting will be held in the Metro Board Room (Metro Headquarters, 3rdFloor, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012).
 
TRAFFIC CONGESTION

The Draft EIR/EIS’s short term analysis has provided misleading interpretations that the Tunnel Alternative will relieve congestion and improve air quality.

Analysis of the long term impacts of induced demand(extending the analysis to 2050) would show that the Tunnel Alternative would increase vehicle miles traveled and result in the freeways becoming congested again.

Ultimately, the Tunnel Alternative would merely shift congestion to other areas.

90% of motorists would receive no travel-time savings, or their travel time would worsen, with the Tunnel Alternative.

The few who would benefit from the Project would receive a travel-time savings of just 2.5 minutes. 

These nominal changes do not justify the Freeway Tunnel Alternative’s $5.6 billion price tag.

The Southern California Association of Governments has even called the Tunnel Alternative “the worst case scenario”.

PROJECT FUNDING

The Draft EIR/EIS did not include a Traffic and Revenue Study.

The Draft EIR/EIS’s use of a $4 toll in their analysis is unrealistic because of the reliance on a PPP to cover over 50% of the cost of the Tunnel Alternative.

PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT

The Purpose and Need Statement for the Draft EIR/EIS is outdated and focuses on the solely on the movement of cars instead of the movement of people.

Recent legislation, including AB 32/SB 375/SB 743, has shifted the focus of transportation planning to the improvement of mobility for individuals across all modes of transportation.

DRAFT EIR/EIS DEFICIENCIES

Experts including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and South Coast Air Quality Management District have determined that the Draft EIR/EIS’s analysis is deficient.

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments has identified significant numbers of “Transit Dependent Populations” in the cities of Alhambra, Monterey Park, San Gabriel, Rosemead, Temple City, and El Monte that would not be served by the Tunnel Alternative.

The Tunnel Alternative would ignore these individuals and create an inequitable mode of transportation that is only accessible to those able to pay the toll.

JOB CREATION

The Draft EIR/EIS showed that the Light Rail Alternative would result in the greatest number of long-term jobs of all of the build alternatives.

Add your reaction Share

Metro Board to make historic decision whether to approve motion to recommend TSM/TDM alt instead of Tunnel

18622566_10155112039650751_4911359309355194418_n.pngAfter decades of fighting the SR-710 extension we have reached a turning point in the debate! This Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 9:00 am the Metro Board will make a historic decision on whether to approve a motion to recommend the TSM/TDM Alternative instead of the Tunnel Alternative as the Locally Preferred Alternative. This would effectively close the door on this issue. If you would like to make public comment you may do so at the meeting or submit them in writing to Metro CEO, Phillip A. Washington and the Metro Board via email: WashingtonP@metro.net or fax: 213-922-4594.

Background: On May 17, 2017 the Metro Ad Hoc Highway, Congestion and Road Committee approved a motion to recommend the TSM/TDM Alternative to Caltrans as the Locally Preferred Alternative; and reallocate the remaining Measure R funds to projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion. While the vote will not kill the Tunnel Alternative outright, it is a step in the right direction to put an end to the SR-710 extension project.

For more information regarding the history of the SR-710 and the City of South Pasadena's recent efforts, please visit: http://www.southpasadenaca.gov/index.aspx?page=57
Add your reaction Share

Can you imagine a place with more bikes than cars?

"Residents of Copenhagen enjoy the highest rates of longevity - living longer and healthier than those in any other city in a longevity study published a few years ago. Active living is a key reason why," says Dr. Marina Khubesrian

Copenhagen_Bikes.png

Add your reaction Share

Los Angeles County gets a “C” grade in energy use and persistent air pollution

latimes_c_grade_for_la_county_environment.png

LA Times article by Dan Weikel - "The 2017 Sustainable LA Environmental Report Card for Energy and Air Quality handed the region that mediocre grade based on what it calls a failure to reduce fuel use, increasing commute times and some of the worst smog in the nation.

On the upside, researchers noted that local cities are developing crucial sustainability plans, air quality is at its best in 40 years and county voters recently approved a sales tax measure to build more public transit.

UCLA’s environmental report card, released Thursday, is an assessment of the region’s energy use, greenhouse gas emissions and air quality."

READ MORE HERE

Add your reaction Share

L.A. keeps building near freeways, even though living there makes people sick

CLICK HERE to read the Los Angeles Times article

March_LA_Times_article_on_pollution_near_freeways.png

Add your reaction Share

Press Conference: Assemblyman Chris Holden announces AB287 to eliminate the 710 tunnel option

Add your reaction Share

It's finally time to end the 710 Tunnel talk!

Its_finally_time_to_end_the_710_Tunnel_talk.jpg

Add your reaction Share

NEWS: Q&A on Proposal for 710 Extension (50+ years of opposition)

 news source: South Pasadena Review, December 15, 2016

IMG_8977.jpg

Add your reaction Share

Beyond the 710 joins a wide coalition in Yes on Measure M campaign

yes_on_measure_m.png

South Pasadena City Council member Marina Khubesrian, M.D. attended a press conference to support the Vote Yes on Measure M campaign along with a wide coalition of elected officials, environmental groups, public health organizations, labor groups and chambers of commerce.

Measure M is the LA County Traffic Improvement Plan that will fund infrastructure and traffic improvement projects resulting in:

  • 15% less time stuck in traffic
  • 465,000 new jobs
  • Fill potholes and repair roads now in all 88 LA County Cities
  • Affordable fares for seniors, disabled people and students
  • Earthquake retrofits to bridges and overpasses
  • does not fund the building of new freeways and excludes any funds from being used for construction of a 710 tunnel.

 CLICK HERE to read more...

 

Add your reaction Share